Top 8 QA Automation Tools For Software Testing In 2023

Today, software developers have no option but to provide a software application near perfection. Automation
is a great way to expand operations and save time and money. All the repetitive testing tasks that take a
long time and are challenging to complete manually are automated using automated software tools. On the other
hand, manual testing necessitates a trained human’s precise execution of test actions.

As a result, automation testing expands the number of tests on a software program. Also, automation testing
tools automatically examine software products’ test cases and anticipated outcomes.

Also, it’s important to note that using the appropriate automation tools at the correct times is crucial for
producing high-quality products quickly.

Why Do We Need Automation Testing?

• Automated tests are much quicker than manual tests and can minimize costs & time to execute repeatitive tests.

• Automated testing can expand the scope and coverage of tests to raise the software’s quality.

• It can examine an application’s internal programs, code, data tables, and file to check if it functions as intended.

• It can easily execute hundreds of complicated test cases, giving test coverage that is not achievable with manual tests.

• Automated tests carry out the same processes as manual testing and never forget to capture detailed results.
  The time saved from not having to repeat tests manually allows testers to develop new test cases and work with complicated features.

• Developers can utilize shared automated tests to find issues before forwarding them to QA. Tests are
  run when source code changes are checked in; if failed, th team or developer is notified.

Advantages of Using Automation Testing

Some of the significant benefits of test automation are listed below:

Increased Precision

Automation testing offers greater precision than human testing. Minor errors may occur during manual testing,
even if it’s performed by a skilled individual.

Automation tools generate more accurate test cases. Besides, it ensures that no single defect or error goes into production.

Enhanced Test Coverage

When you test locally hosted apps across different browsers on a
Manual testing can be difficult and time-consuming when executing extensive test cases. However, because
automated testing is faster, it can complete lengthy tests in a short period.

Also, test automation allows for the execution of additional tests. The features of a software product are
tested using more test cases to ensure that they meet the highest quality requirements.

Early Detection of Bugs

In a software application’s development, automation tools help find bugs or other flaws. Later, the time and
money needed to fix defects are significantly reduced when they are discovered early on.

Test automation offers quicker feedback. It also provides input for every run of a test case. That is why it
gets simpler to find issues throughout the SDLC process.

Cost-effective

Repeated test case execution is not possible in manual testing due to increased costs. On the other hand, test
scripts created by automation tools can be utilized repeatedly, which saves money in the long run.

High Performance for Apps

Automation testing can provide a significant amount of test coverage. It ensures that a software product is of
the highest quality and performs well.

Testers can run several test cases simultaneously on various platforms – thanks to automation. An application’s
performance and quality improve as the number of tests run increases.

Less stress for the QA team

The QA staff can work on activities other than manual testing by deploying an automated testing. In addition,
once the monotonous component of manual testing is eliminated, the job description of a QA engineer becomes fascinating.

Test automation offers many QA engineers the chance to test new tools to enhance the current testing suite or add new capabilities.

Determining the Build’s Stability Immediately

You can automate tests to check the reliability of your build using test automation. For instance, smoke
testing is frequently used to confirm stability. It is cumbersome and necessitates the testing engineer’s
manual input, such as creating databases with test data. However, with automation, creating test data profile
and using them in different test cases is a breeze.

Eliminate human error

Human error is possible when performing manual testing. Even with test automation, mistakes may happen.
However, when automation is used for the test suite, the number of errors is substantially lower. As a result,
using test automation to prevent mistakes makes sense, especially for complicated cases.

1. Testsigma

Testsigma is built for quality engineering teams that need a lean test automation setup that enables scale
and speed concurrently. You can write, run, debug, and analyze self-healing tests in simple English for web,
mobile apps, APIs, databases, and more using Testsigma. You can customize the platform using Java, but the
codeless test automation makes test creation quick and easy for testers and non-technical team members.

See how PerfectMind accelerates its delivery pipeline by automating smoke and regression test suites with Testsigma.

Read the story

Testsigma’s built-in test lab offers 3000+ real devices and browsers on high availability cloud, making it
easy to scale your test automation efforts. The platform’s intelligent algorithm automatically detects and
fixes page elements, ensuring that tests run smoothly even when changes are made to the application under test.
Testsigma also provides detailed test reports that include information about test results, test execution time,
device details, and other critical testing metrics, which help identify quality trends over time.

Testsigma also offers native integrations with popular tools such as Jira, Jenkins, GitHub, and Slack,
allowing for better collaboration among team members and ensuring continuous delivery and testing. The visual
testing feature captures screenshots of your application and compares them with baseline images, highlighting any
differences that need to be addressed. With parallel test execution, continuous testing, and comprehensive test reports,
Testsigma helps teams achieve faster release cycles and faster feedback loops.

Selenium

While Selenium is a powerful and flexible tool, there are some limitations to its use in software testing and QA automation:

• Limited support for desktop applications: Selenium is primarily designed for testing web applications
  and has limited support for desktop applications.

• Inability to handle Captchas: Selenium cannot handle CAPTCHA tests, which are used to verify that a
  user is human and not a robot.

• Limited support for mobile testing: Selenium supports mobile testing, but it has limited support for
  mobile platforms and can be challenging to use on mobile devices.

• No built-in reporting: Selenium does not have built-in reporting capabilities, which can make it
  challenging to analyze and share test results.

• Maintenance overhead: Selenium requires regular maintenance and updates to keep up with changes in web
  browsers and web applications, which can be time-consuming and require technical expertise.

• Limited support for non-browser-based testing: Selenium is primarily designed for testing web applications,
  and it has limited support for non-browser-based testing, such as testing APIs or databases

• Requires programming knowledge: Selenium requires knowledge of programming languages like Java, Python,
  or C#, which can be a barrier for some users who need to become more familiar with these languages.

Telerik Test Studio

Based on customer reviews and feedback, some common cons of using Telerik Test Studio for QA automation are:

• Cost: Customers have reported that Telerik Test Studio can be expensive compared to other testing tools.

• Steep learning curve: Some users have reported that Telerik Test Studio has a steep
  learning curve and can be challenging to use for beginners.

• Limited support for non-web applications: Telerik Test Studio is primarily designed
  for testing web applications and has limited support for non-web applications.

• Slow execution time: Some users have reported that the execution time for tests on
  Telerik Test Studio can be slow, which can be frustrating when running a large number of tests.

• Limited integration with other tools: Customers have reported that Telerik Test Studio
  has limited integration capabilities with other tools and platforms, which can make it challenging to integrate into existing workflows.

• Lack of features: Some customers have reported that Telerik Test Studio has limited
  features compared to other testing tools, which can make it challenging to address all of their testing needs.

Katalon Studio

Katalon is incredible but could be better. It has:

• Limited support for non-web applications: Katalon Studio is primarily designed for
  testing web applications and has limited support for non-web applications.

• Steep learning curve: Some users have reported that Katalon Studio has a steep
  learning curve and can be challenging to use for beginners.

• Limited reporting capabilities: Some users have reported that Katalon Studio has
  limited reporting capabilities, which can make it difficult to analyze and share test results.

• Limited integrations with other tools: Some users have reported that Katalon Studio
  has limited integration capabilities with other tools and platforms, which can make it challenging to integrate into existing workflows.

• Limited object spy capabilities: Katalon Studio’s object spy feature can be limited
  and may not work well with certain web applications or environments.

• Stability issues: Some users have reported stability issues with Katalon Studio,
  such as crashes or freezes, which can be frustrating and time-consuming to deal with.

• Cost: Some users have reported that the cost of Katalon Studio can be high compared to other automation tools.

Cucumber

Some areas where Cucumber may be lacking as a QA automation tool include:

• Limited support for non-web applications: Cucumber is primarily designed for testing
  web applications and has limited support for non-web applications.

• Steep learning curve: Some users have reported that Cucumber has a steep learning curve,
  particularly for users who are not familiar with BDD (Behavior Driven Development) or Gherkin syntax.

• Limited reporting capabilities: Cucumber’s reporting capabilities can be limited and
  may not provide the level of detail or customization that some users require.

• Limited integration with other tools: Cucumber may have limited integration capabilities
  with other testing tools or platforms, which can make it challenging to integrate into existing workflows.

• Maintenance overhead: Cucumber requires regular maintenance and updates to keep up
  with changes in web browsers and web applications, which can be time-consuming and require technical expertise.

• Requires programming knowledge: Cucumber requires knowledge of programming languages
  like Java or Ruby, which can be a barrier for some users who are not familiar with these languages.

Appium

Some reasons why teams might move away from Appium for QA automation include:

• Steep learning curve: Appium can have a steep learning curve, particularly for users
  who are not familiar with mobile automation or Selenium WebDriver.

• Limited support for desktop applications: Appium is primarily designed for testing
  mobile applications and may have limited support for desktop applications.

• Limited reporting capabilities: Appium’s reporting capabilities can be limited and
  may not provide the level of detail or customization that some users require.

• Limited integration with other tools: Appium may have limited integration capabilities
  with other testing tools or platforms, which can make it challenging to integrate into existing workflows.

• Maintenance overhead: Appium requires regular maintenance and updates to keep up with
  changes in mobile operating systems and mobile devices, which can be time-consuming and require technical expertise.

• Performance issues: Appium’s performance can be affected by factors such as
  network latency and device hardware, which can lead to slow or unreliable test execution.

TestingWhiz

Some cons of using TestingWhiz for QA automation could include:

• Limited support for non-web applications: TestingWhiz is primarily designed for
  testing web applications and may have limited support for non-web applications.

• Limited object recognition capabilities: Some users have reported that TestingWhiz’s
  object recognition capabilities can be limited and may not work well with certain web applications or environments.

• Limited scripting language support: TestingWhiz only supports the use of its own
  proprietary scripting language, which can be a limitation for users who prefer to use other programming languages.

• Steep learning curve: Some users have reported that TestingWhiz has a steep learning
  curve and can be challenging to use for beginners.

• Limited integration with other tools: TestingWhiz may have limited integration capabilities
  with other testing tools or platforms, which can make it challenging to integrate into existing workflows

• Stability issues: Some users have reported stability issues with TestingWhiz, such as
  crashes or freezes, which can be frustrating and time-consuming to deal with.

• Cost: Some users have reported that the cost of TestingWhiz can be high compared to other automation tools.

The Best Automation Tool for Software Testing

Testsigma offers a simple UI that allows users to automate testing smoothly. It enables you to write scriptless
test cases using a standard language, making it easier even for non-technical users.

Testsigma features a test automation environment that allows them to plan, design, and develop test cases for
continuous testing in Agile and DevOps.

Some significant aspects of Testsigma that allow it to sit right on top of the deck include:

• Testsigma’s English-based NLP’s provides scriptless automation testing, which doesn’t need prior programming knowledge to run tests.

• Because it is a cloud-based product, it provides on-demand access to tools, test environments, platforms,
  and results. Create, run, and analyze test cases and reports from anywhere, at any time.

• Low-cost installation and speedier product delivery with quick automated parallel testing tools for
  large and complicated test suites.

• Allows for integration with CI/CD and debugging tools and the generation and sharing of drill-down
  thorough test reports with the team.

• Test Automation and continuous testing have become essential for all software products to meet rising demand.

The goal of Testsigma is to democratize continuous testing by incorporating automation into every area of an
organization’s testing requirements. It enables businesses of all sizes to test and deliver software faster than ever.

Conclusion

Automation testing technologies have shown to be quite helpful in creating robust, scalable, and
dependable applications in our fast-paced digital era. Everyone wants to use software that is faultless and error-free.

I strongly advise implementing automated testing as part of their routine day-to-day development activities
if the quality of your product is the top concern. It will guarantee that your application is thoroughly
tested and inspire confidence in developers, management, and customers.

Automated testing, which adheres to the “Fail fast, Fail early” tenet, provides feedback on failures more
quickly than manual testing. Automated testing might be expensive upfront, but the long-term benefits of the
investment include decreased workload, the abolition of manual errors, increased accuracy, and reduced cost and time.

It contributes to quality assurance in a way that manual testing will never be able to. Therefore, choose
automated testing tools based on pricing, platform, OS compatibility, test development, and data according
to the requirements.

Start automating your cross browser tests with Testsigma today.

Sign-up here